Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marsel Ilhan vs Federico Delbonis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilhan vs Delbonis analysis and find out who is favored!
Marsel Ilhan vs Federico Delbonis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ilhan 1 - 0 Delbonis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilhan has won 49.16% of points on their second serve, while Delbonis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilhan, in recent form, has won 55.87% of their opponent's second serve points, while Delbonis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.95% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilhan has saved 53.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Delbonis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilhan has won 63.89% of matches played (W/L 23/ 13), with Delbonis winning 47.62% (W/L 10/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilhan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 303/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22). Delbonis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 412/ 245), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilhan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 21/ 12), where as Delbonis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 10/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilhan winning 1 times and Delbonis being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilhan winning 2 and Delbonis winning 0. The last match between Ilhan and Delbonis was at the Scheveningen Challenger, 04-07-2011, First, Clay with Marsel Ilhan getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilhan and Delbonis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilhan winning 0 times and Delbonis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilhan winning 0, and Delbonis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilhan has played against opponents with an average rank of 34.72 while Delbonis has played against players with an average rank of 299.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilhan has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Delbonis has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilhan has converted 44.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Delbonis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
877
Rank
77
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
389
Rank
33
High
33
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
59% (650-452)
Career Total W/L
56% (492-385)
65% (15-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$591,915
Career Prize Money
$2,684,293
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Marsel Ilhan vs Federico Delbonis For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ilhan VS Delbonis
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Marsel Ilhan | Federico Delbonis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:24 | 1:5:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (30/48) | 61% (34/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 90% (27/30) | 56% (19/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (10/18) | 55% (12/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (25/56) | 23% (11/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Federico Delbonis
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marsel Ilhan | Federico Delbonis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (15/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (32/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (279/236) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 65% (15/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 24 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 23 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:13 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (575/990) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (386/575) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (204/415) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (49/110) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (462/1068) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (15/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (15/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Marsel Ilhan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gokberk Saritas
Player
Marsel Ilhan
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Lars Goran Verwerft
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Alper Okay Meryumoglu
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
S Mert Ozdemir
Player
Marsel Ilhan
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Marsel Ilhan
74%
(
68 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
0
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Gokberk Saritas
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Geni Inoue
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Federico Delbonis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Federico Delbonis
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Delbonis
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Delbonis
Player
Blaise Bicknell
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Federico Delbonis
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Federico Delbonis
49%
(
39 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Federico Delbonis
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Federico Delbonis
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Federico Delbonis
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
17
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Federico Delbonis
82%
(
62 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Delbonis
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilhan Vs Delbonis Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ilhan are available here and Delbonis photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
